Should You Put Hydrogen Peroxide or Rubbing Alcohol on a Cut?

Medically reviewed by Gunjan Modi, MD, FAAD, FACMS, board-certified dermatologist and fellowship-trained Mohs surgeon · Updated October 2, 2026

The short answer

For an everyday cut, no. Neither one is needed to clean it. In lab tests, hydrogen peroxide harmed the skin cells that help a wound heal. In two randomized trials, after appendix surgery and around wrist pins, it did not come out ahead. The fizz is oxygen gas: an enzyme in your blood and tissue splits peroxide into water and oxygen. Fizzing does not prove germs are being killed. We found no trial of rubbing alcohol on a healing cut, so the advice to skip it rests on the same cell-harm concern and on expert guidance, not a trial. For an everyday cut, wash with mild soap and running water, keep it moist with plain petroleum jelly, and cover it with a nonstick bandage. If you have a surgical wound, follow the instructions from the surgeon who treated you.

Still life of a glass jar of plain petrolatum and a roll of cotton gauze on linen

What peroxide does to skin cells

Household hydrogen peroxide is a 3 percent solution. It is an oxidizing agent, and that is how it kills germs. The problem is that it does the same thing to the cells your body uses to repair a wound. In a 1985 lab study, 3 percent hydrogen peroxide at full strength killed 100 percent of the human fibroblasts it was placed on. Fibroblasts are the cells that rebuild the deeper layer of skin. When the researchers diluted the peroxide step by step, it kept harming fibroblasts more than it harmed the bacteria, across the dilutions tested.

A 2005 lab study measured 17 wound cleansers and 3 liquid soaps on cultured human skin cells and gave each one a toxicity index from 0 to 100,000. Hydrogen peroxide scored the maximum, 100,000, on keratinocytes, the outer-skin cells that resurface a wound. Only the products at the two ends of the scale are reported, and the index is a cell-culture measure, not a measure of harm in a living wound.

These are lab-dish results, and they need that label. Cells in a dish have no blood, no tissue fluid, and no rinse to wash the peroxide away. The same 1985 research group concluded that 3 percent hydrogen peroxide was unsuitable for use in wound care, yet in their animal experiment peroxide was the one cell-toxic antiseptic that did not slow wound healing. Lab toxicity does not translate one-for-one into harm in a living wound. It is a reason for caution, not proof of damage.

Why it fizzes and turns the skin white

Blood and living tissue contain an enzyme called catalase. When hydrogen peroxide touches it, catalase splits the peroxide into water and oxygen gas, fast. The fizz you see is that oxygen escaping. A toxicology review of hydrogen peroxide describes this rapid breakdown by catalase into oxygen and water; it is the reason the body clears peroxide so quickly.

The white color is thought to come from the same reaction: oxygen forming in the top layers of the skin faster than it can escape, so tiny bubbles make the tissue look pale. None of the studies on this page measured the whitening directly, so that is an explanation, not a tested finding. It fades on its own.

Fizzing does not prove germs are being killed. It happens because your own cells and blood carry catalase, whether or not the cut is infected. Peroxide can kill bacteria, but the bubbling tells you nothing about that. It only tells you the enzyme is there.

Does it prevent infection or speed healing?

Two randomized trials have tested hydrogen peroxide on wounds in people. In a 1981 trial, 217 patients having an appendix removed were assigned to topical hydrogen peroxide or no peroxide. There was no statistically significant difference in wound infection rates between the groups. In a 2006 trial, 118 patients with 120 broken wrists held by external pins were assigned to daily pin-site care with a half-and-half mix of saline and hydrogen peroxide, to chlorhexidine discs, or to dry dressings alone. Pin-site complications were not reduced by either treatment, and the authors recommended dry, sterile dressings only.

Neither trial is a clean skin-surgery wound or an everyday cut, and no difference found is not the same as proven useless. But we could find no trial that has tested household peroxide against soap and water on a clean cut or a healing skin-surgery wound. These are the trials there are, and nothing in them shows a benefit.

On healing speed, the evidence is lab and animal, and it is mixed. In a small pig study (four animals), 3 percent peroxide significantly reduced the formation of new dermis and was the only agent tested that did not significantly increase fibroblast growth, though the wounds resurfaced at the same rate as the others. A 1975 study of surgical donor sites found that peroxide seemed to loosen the scab sooner and shorten healing time, but blisters and ulceration appeared when it was applied after the scab had separated and new skin was visible. The authors advised avoiding it once the crust is gone.

What about rubbing alcohol?

We looked for a study of rubbing alcohol on a healing cut and did not find one. So the advice here rests on two things, not on a trial. The first is the same principle as peroxide: in the lab tests above, antiseptics strong enough to kill germs also harmed skin cells. All four antiseptics in the 1985 study killed 100 percent of fibroblasts at full strength. Alcohol was not among the products tested, so applying that finding to alcohol is an inference. The second is guidance: the American Academy of Dermatology's patient pages name mild soap and water for cleaning a cut, not alcohol, and the CDC's 2017 guideline on surgical infection places alcohol-based antiseptics on intact skin before an incision, not in the wound afterward.

Rubbing alcohol also stings on an open cut, which is reason enough for most people. Keep both alcohol and peroxide away from the eyes; the toxicology review notes that even 3 percent peroxide stings and irritates the eye. If the surgeon who treated you gave you different instructions for a specific reason, follow them.

Where antiseptics do belong

Antiseptics are not bad. They have a real job, on the right surface. The CDC's 2017 guideline for preventing infection after surgery says skin preparation in the operating room should use an alcohol-based agent, with exceptions. That is intact skin, wiped before the first cut. Cleaning the skin before surgery and cleaning an open wound afterward are different jobs.

Antiseptics are also used on some infected or high-risk wounds, chosen by a clinician. A 2018 expert consensus on wound antisepsis recommends specific agents for infected, contaminated, and chronic wounds, and in the same document classes hydrogen peroxide alone as obsolete. The point is who chooses and why. A wound-care specialist selecting an antiseptic for a stalled, infected ulcer is a different situation from a bottle of peroxide poured on a kitchen cut.

Surgeons also differ on brief, directed uses. The 1975 donor-site study found that peroxide seemed to loosen scabs sooner before the crust separated, and some surgeons use a diluted solution for a short time to loosen dried blood or crust around a healing wound. The studies on this page do not settle whether that brief use helps or hurts. It is a different question from daily home use, and the answer belongs to the surgeon who treated you.

What to use instead

First, if you had skin surgery, your wound is not an everyday cut. Grafts, flaps, wounds left to heal on their own, and wounds under a pressure dressing or bolster each have their own care, and your dressing may need to stay on until the surgeon says. Follow the instructions you were given, and ask before you change anything. The rest of this section is for an everyday cut.

The American Academy of Dermatology's patient pages give a simple routine. Wash the cut gently with mild soap and cool or lukewarm running water to remove dirt. Do not use an antibacterial or deodorant soap, and never scrub. Plain tap water is fine: in a trial that followed 634 adults with stitched cuts seen in emergency departments, 4 percent of cuts rinsed with tap water became infected, compared with 3.3 percent rinsed with sterile saline. The trial could not rule out a modest difference, but the rates were similar. A 2022 Cochrane review that pooled 13 randomized trials with 2,504 participants reached the same place: cleaning with tap water, compared with sterile saline, showed no evidence of more infections, though the authors rated the evidence very low certainty. The chart below shows that review.

Then keep the wound moist and covered. A thin layer of plain petroleum jelly keeps it from drying out and forming a scab, and the AAD notes that wounds with scabs take longer to heal. Cover it with a nonstick bandage. For a clean wound you do not need an antibiotic ointment: in a randomized trial of 922 dermatologic surgery patients, infection occurred in 2.0 percent with plain white petrolatum and 0.9 percent with bacitracin, a difference that was not statistically significant, and the only allergic skin reactions were in the bacitracin group (4 patients, versus none with petrolatum, also not statistically significant). One caution from that trial: all eight Staphylococcus aureus infections were in the petrolatum group. An itchy red rash around a wound can be an allergy to an ointment rather than an infection; our article Should You Put Neosporin on a Wound? covers that in detail.

  • Mild soap and running water to clean it. Not peroxide, not alcohol.
  • A thin layer of plain petroleum jelly to keep it moist.
  • A nonstick bandage over the top.
  • Then, if a surgeon treated you, ask the surgeon who treated you before changing anything.

Figure

Cleaning a wound: plain tap water compared with sterile saline

Wound infections after cleansing with water instead of sterile saline, pooled from randomized trials. The question behind the figure is simple: is ordinary water safe for washing a wound? Each row is one comparison the review made; a value below 1.0 means fewer infections with water, above 1.0 means more.

Data: Fernandez R, Green HL, Griffiths R, Atkinson RA, Ellwood LJ. Water for wound cleansing. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2022;9:CD003861. The review pooled 13 randomized trials with 2,504 participants aged 2 to 95, with open fractures, surgical wounds, traumatic wounds, anal fissures, and chronic wounds, mostly in India and the United States. Limits: the authors rated all three comparisons very low-certainty evidence, every interval crosses 1.0, and the two lower rows are open fractures, not skin cuts. The review did not test hydrogen peroxide or rubbing alcohol. What this means: the review found no evidence that cleaning with tap water increased infection compared with sterile saline, which is why plain water is a reasonable way to wash an everyday cut. For a surgical wound, ask the surgeon who treated you. This figure is our own drawing of the published numbers.

See the numbers as a table
Wound infection after cleansing with water compared with sterile saline, Cochrane review 2022
ComparisonTrials and participantsRisk ratio95% confidence intervalCertainty
Tap water compared with sterile saline, all wound types8 trials, 2,204 participants0.840.59 to 1.19Very low
Distilled water compared with sterile saline, open fractures2 trials, 152 participants0.700.45 to 1.09Very low
Cooled boiled water compared with sterile saline, open fractures1 trial, 51 participants0.830.37 to 1.87Very low

When a cut needs a doctor

Most minor cuts heal in a week or less with the care above. See a doctor for a deep or gaping cut, a bite, a puncture, dirt that will not rinse out, or bleeding that does not stop with steady pressure. People with diabetes, a weakened immune system, or fragile skin should call sooner rather than later.

Call if redness spreads beyond the edge of the wound, pain increases after the first few days instead of easing, the wound drains pus, or you develop a fever. If you had skin surgery, the instructions from your surgeon tell you when and whom to call, and those come first.

This page is general education and should not be construed as medical advice. An everyday cut and a healing surgical wound are not the same, and surgeons differ in how they care for wounds. Always consult your own doctor, the surgeon or clinician who treated you, and follow their instructions before putting anything on a wound. If we treated you and you have a question about a healing wound, call us at (972) 378-0620.

Common questions

Answers reflect the general case — a physician who can see the wound always beats a page that cannot.

For an everyday cut, it is not recommended. Peroxide is not needed to clean a cut, and in lab tests it harmed the cells that help a wound heal. In two randomized trials it did not come out ahead on infection. The American Academy of Dermatology's patient pages say to clean a wound with soap and water and never with hydrogen peroxide. If a surgeon told you to use it a specific way, follow those instructions.

Blood and tissue contain catalase, an enzyme that splits peroxide into water and oxygen gas. The fizz is the oxygen escaping. The white color is thought to be the same oxygen caught in the top layers of the skin, though no study on this page measured it directly. It fades on its own. Fizzing does not prove germs are being killed. It happens because the enzyme is there, infected or not.

No study shows that. In a small pig study, 3 percent peroxide reduced new dermis formation, though the wounds resurfaced at the same rate. In a 1975 study of surgical donor sites, peroxide seemed to loosen scabs sooner but caused blisters and ulceration when used after the scab came off. The two human trials measured infection and pin-site problems, not healing speed, and found no benefit.

Not for an everyday cut. Mild soap and running water remove dirt, and in a trial of stitched cuts, tap water and sterile saline had similar infection rates, 4 percent and 3.3 percent, and a 2022 Cochrane review of 13 trials found no evidence that tap water increased infection compared with saline. A 2018 expert consensus on wound antisepsis classes hydrogen peroxide alone as obsolete. Clinicians do use other antiseptics on some infected or high-risk wounds; that choice belongs to the person treating the wound.

We found no study of rubbing alcohol on a healing cut, so the advice rests on principle and guidance rather than a trial. The principle: in the lab tests above, antiseptics strong enough to kill germs also harmed skin cells, though alcohol itself was not tested. The guidance: dermatology patient pages name soap and water, and the CDC places alcohol-based antiseptics on intact skin before surgery, not in the wound. It also stings. Use soap and water instead.

No. Some surgeons use a diluted solution briefly to loosen dried blood or crust around a healing wound. A short, directed use chosen by your surgeon is a different question from pouring full-strength peroxide on a cut every day, and the studies on this page do not settle it. Surgeons differ. Follow the instructions you were given, and call your surgeon's office if you have a question.

The evidence does not say so. The lab studies show what peroxide does to cells in a dish, and the animal experiment from the same 1985 research group found no slower healing. We know of no study of a single home use. Stop using it, go back to mild soap and water, keep the cut moist and covered, and watch it the way you would any cut. If you had skin surgery, tell your surgeon's office what you used.

No. Household peroxide is 3 percent. Stronger solutions are sold for other purposes, some at 35 percent or more. A toxicology review describes concentrated hydrogen peroxide as caustic: on skin it can cause inflammation, blistering, and severe damage, and solutions above 10 percent can ulcerate the eye. Keep concentrated peroxide away from skin and eyes. If it is not needed at 3 percent, it is not needed at any strength.

Selected peer-reviewed literature

The data behind the answer.

  1. Lineaweaver W, McMorris S, Soucy D, Howard R. Cellular and bacterial toxicities of topical antimicrobials. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 1985;75(3):394–396.
  2. Lineaweaver W, Howard R, Soucy D, et al. Topical antimicrobial toxicity. Archives of Surgery. 1985;120(3):267–270.
  3. Wilson JR, Mills JG, Prather ID, Dimitrijevich SD. A toxicity index of skin and wound cleansers used on in vitro fibroblasts and keratinocytes. Advances in Skin & Wound Care. 2005;18(7):373–378.
  4. Bennett LL, Rosenblum RS, Perlov C, Davidson JM, Barton RM, Nanney LB. An in vivo comparison of topical agents on wound repair. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2001;108(3):675–687.
  5. Gruber RP, Vistnes L, Pardoe R. The effect of commonly used antiseptics on wound healing. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 1975;55(4):472–476.
  6. Lau WY, Wong SH. Randomized, prospective trial of topical hydrogen peroxide in appendectomy wound infection. American Journal of Surgery. 1981;142(3):393–397.
  7. Egol KA, Paksima N, Puopolo S, Klugman J, Hiebert R, Koval KJ. Treatment of external fixation pins about the wrist: a prospective, randomized trial. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American). 2006;88(2):349–354.
  8. Kramer A, Dissemond J, Kim S, et al. Consensus on wound antisepsis: update 2018. Skin Pharmacology and Physiology. 2018;31(1):28–58.
  9. Watt BE, Proudfoot AT, Vale JA. Hydrogen peroxide poisoning. Toxicological Reviews. 2004;23(1):51–57.
  10. Moscati RM, Mayrose J, Reardon RF, Janicke DM, Jehle DV. A multicenter comparison of tap water versus sterile saline for wound irrigation. Academic Emergency Medicine. 2007;14(5):404–409.
  11. Fernandez R, Green HL, Griffiths R, Atkinson RA, Ellwood LJ. Water for wound cleansing. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2022;9:CD003861.
  12. Berríos-Torres SI, Umscheid CA, Bratzler DW, et al. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guideline for the prevention of surgical site infection, 2017. JAMA Surgery. 2017;152(8):784–791.
  13. Smack DP, Harrington AC, Dunn C, et al. Infection and allergy incidence in ambulatory surgery patients using white petrolatum vs bacitracin ointment: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 1996;276(12):972–977.
  14. American Academy of Dermatology patient pages: Scars: overview ("Never use hydrogen peroxide"); Skin biopsy: dermatologist-recommended wound care; How to treat minor cuts; Minimize a scar: proper wound care tips. aad.org, accessed October 2, 2026.

Request a Consultation

A question about a spot that worries you?

Call us, or send an appointment request — requests receive a call back within one business day.

(972) 378-0620

6100 Windhaven Parkway, Plano, TX 75093 · Mon-Thurs: 7:30-4 | Fri: 10-2